electronics:opamps:opamp-feedback
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| electronics:opamps:opamp-feedback [2026/05/15 12:07] – created oscar | electronics:opamps:opamp-feedback [2026/05/15 12:21] (current) – oscar | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
| * noise requirements | * noise requirements | ||
| + | ===== How to calculate? ===== | ||
| + | ==== CASE 1 — Simple bandwidth limiting ==== | ||
| + | Adding Cf creates a low-pass filter in the feedback path.The cutoff frequency is approximately: | ||
| + | fc = 1 / (2π * Rf * Cf) | ||
| + | So: | ||
| + | * larger capacitor → lower bandwidth | ||
| + | * larger resistor → lower bandwidth | ||
| + | ==== CASE 2 — Compensation for input capacitance ==== | ||
| + | This is more subtle and very important in fast/ | ||
| + | * op-amp input capacitance | ||
| + | * PCB stray capacitance | ||
| + | * cable capacitance | ||
| + | * transistor gate capacitance | ||
| + | This capacitance together with Rin creates a pole: | ||
| + | fp = 1 / (2π * Rin * Cin ) | ||
| + | This pole can destroy phase margin. A feedback capacitor introduces a zero that compensates it. | ||
| + | A common approximation is: | ||
| + | Cf ≈ Cin * (Rin / Rf) | ||
| + | This is widely used as a starting point. | ||
| + | ==== CASE 3 — Transimpedance amplifiers ==== | ||
| + | For photodiodes and probes, the feedback capacitor is often mandatory. Without it: huge peaking, oscillation, | ||
| + | The optimal value depends on: | ||
| + | * op-amp GBP | ||
| + | * total input capacitance | ||
| + | * feedback resistor | ||
| + | A common approximation: | ||
| + | Cf ≈ SQRT( Cin / ( 2π * Rf * GBW ) ) | ||
| + | where: | ||
| + | GBW = op-amp gain-bandwidth product | ||
| + | Cin = total input capacitance | ||
| + | |||
| + | But in practice this is usually refined using: | ||
| + | * SPICE simulation | ||
| + | * phase margin analysis | ||
| + | * bench tuning | ||
electronics/opamps/opamp-feedback.txt · Last modified: by oscar
